| Notes from the Editor: The #1 Reason Mayor John Noguez Will be Reelected in 2007 Quid Pro Quo, Anyone? Posted May 15, 2006, 7:00 am The Editor, WatchOurCity.com Huntington Park, CA - The 2007 political fundraising campaign season has kicked off with a bang, folks. Actually, it's been underway for a while, since the 2003 campaign got off the ground with a visit from Assembly Member Fabian Nunez when he personally showed up at Noguez's slate campaign kickoff held in January 2003 at Leonardo's Restaurant. Last week, on Thursday night, John Noguez held his reelection political campaign fundraiser at the Sizzler Restaurant on Florence Avenue at Alameda Boulevard, also known as the Alameda Corridor. This is right next to the submerged railroad corridor built exclusively for cargo trains, which brings "...a steady stream of diesel-belching....trains bringing in cheap imports and blanketing the air with toxic pollution", according to an L.A. Weekly report, "Ports of Cough" (9-22-05). Campaign donors filed in to give their respects and kiss the hand of Huntington Park’s self-acclaimed gay Mayor. By all accounts, Noguez emptied out some pretty prominent check books. The public record can attest to the fact that Noguez is a prolific political fundraiser. Most donors are local yokels trying to curry the Mayor's favor. Other donors are out of towners trying to get in on the ground floor of opportunity and on the good side of Mayor Noguez for good measure and for many reasons. I do not believe it is speculation here to say that none of those reasons have to do with the public benefit. The public benefit is not even on the table, folks. It never is, it seems, when it comes to political campaign donations for Noguez. Some donors give willingly; others give grudgingly. Some give because they have to; others give because they are told to. Take for example the engineer who owns the company that contracts with the city to run Huntington Park's Department of Building and Safety. His monthly billings are currently at approximately $80,000 per month, according to the city's warrant drafts. In 2003 the engineering company dolled out $5,000 in campaign contributions to the slate of Noguez, Hernandez and Gomez. Noguez's campaign manager then was the city's Mayor, Edward Escareno. Escareno plead guilty to "Grand Theft" in Los Angeles Superior Court on 12-20-05, on charges presented by the D.A.'s Public Integrity Unit (although the conviction was kept very quiet by the D.A.'a office and by Escareno's buddies in HP's city council). There are other engineering companies just salivating to take over the Building and Safety gig in Huntington Park, which is a powerful carrot, or stick, used by the incumbent candidate in control of the council's majority vote to shake up city contractors for campaign contributions. Did the engineering contractor willingly donate $5,000 to the Noguez campaign in 2003, or was he coerced? If the District Attorney's office ever gets of the butt of Cardinal Roger Mahoney, perhaps it can focus back on this kind of campaign contribution shakedowns here in Huntington Park. All give campaign contributions because they want something in return. The only public benefit that matters in these kinds of gatherings, it seems, is the benefit each donor hopes to receive from giving to John Noguez and his lackey slate. They all want something out of John. And Noguez has a proven track record of delivering, according to the public record, as reported by WatchOurCity.com. Quid Pro Quo, Anyone? Then, as if the Noguez fundraising event needed a real live donor to give credible testimony to the fact that Noguez will pay back the favor and fire up the enthusiasm to loosen the checkbooks, in walks George Cole, city of Bell councilman and Director of the Oldtimers Foundation. Cole managed to get a multi-million dollar HP transportation contract out of Noguez and Escareno, despite the fact that an independent firm rated Cole as the least prepared to comply with contract terms. No problem. Escareno fixed it by rigging the contract. Noguez helped by giving Cole a cool $100,000 in startup costs, approved in a special city council meeting with one agenda item. The Request for Proposal (RFP) for the transportation services contract made no mention of such city assistance. It only applied to George Cole, it seems. And Human Resources helped, at the behest of Victor Caballero, by firing a city staffer who questioned the legality of issuing such a contract. The icing on the cake: They were not even the lowest responsible bidder. Southland Transit submitted a bid that was $22,000 less, and they didn't need $100,000 from the city in upfront costs like Cole's Oldtimers Foundation did. Then, Noguez claimed in an interview in Adelante, a leading Latino gay/lesbian magazine, that he helped bring transportation services to the city, improved the meals on wheels lunch program to seniors, and helped bring in funding for an AIDS clinic. Not mentioned in the article, was that all those contracts were given to George Cole's Oldtimers Foundation. Not only that, but George seemingly started getting greedy and the Noguez-Escareno team obliged him by awarding Senior Housing Management contracts left and right. WatchOurCity.com did some digging and discovered that Noguez and Cole just happen to share the same political fundraiser, Conrado Terrazas, who also wrote the glowing interview of Noguez in Adelante Magazine. So, if anyone doubts that Noguez can deliver the goods in Huntington Park, just ask George Cole and Victor Caballero about Quid Pro Quo. George Cole knows first hand that there is a Santa Clause in HP that delivers special favors, and multi- million dollar city contracts that pay handsome dividends once or twice a month. The city’s warrant drafts are a public record which attest to the rich monthly billings by Cole’s Oldtimers Foundation, and other Noguez campaign contributors. George Cole managed to show up at Sizzler on Thursday evening, it seems, to thank Noguez for all the city contracts awarded to Cole courtesy of Noguez and his lackeys in city council. In 2003, some of the most unusual campaign donors to Noguez all happened to be owners of historic building properties in the historic core district of Downtown Los Angeles (which California Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez represents, along with Huntington Park). A group of these contributors with interests in these Downtown properties gave $3,750 to John Noguez, yet they had no apparent business interests in Huntington Park. Why did they give so much money to Noguez without an apparent interest here? It turns out that their interest was not so much in John Noguez the HP councilman, but in John Noguez the L.A. County Assessor. Noguez has a hand in assessing property taxes in the Downtown L.A. Historic Core District (see WatchOurCity.com's report from 8-16-04). A campaign contribution to Noguez yields astronomical financial returns on investment. In the case of city Attorney Francisco Leal, he donates a total of $1,000 to John Noguez and $3,000 to Ofelia Hernandez for their 2003 campaign. Once they are elected, their campaign manager and fellow councilman Edward Escareno proposes to hire Leal as city attorney in a closed door session without competing bids, according to a published report in the Wave Community Newspaper. Leal's contract stipulates a "not-to-exceed" amount of $25,000 per month in billing fees, which is equivalent to $300,000 per year. Leal's original investment of $4,000 landed him a 7,500% return on investment. City attorney Leal's billings have now reached 3 times the contractually stipulated cap, according to the latest city warrant drafts reviewed by WatchOurCity.com. The City Council majority led by Noguez has no problems with that, evidently. And besides, Noguez, Leal and California Assembly Speaker Nunez are good buddies. Leal and Speaker Nunez could pave the way to an assembly seat for HP's Mayor Noguez, just like Speaker Nunez and Villaraigosa are doing for Assembly candidate Kevin De Leon, a Nunez childhood friend, vying for termed-out Jackie Goldberg's Echo Park Assembly seat, according the L.A. Weekly report from 5-12-06. Noguez can only smell the power and allure of a Sacramento Assembly seat calling him. Terrazas himself was once an unsuccessful candidate for an L.A. City council seat. Jackie Goldberg, a stalwart progressive liberal her entire political career, herself played a "cameo role in a pay-for-play probe" (see L.A. Weekly report by Robert Greene, April 29, 2004). Conrado Terrazas, the fundraising consultant shared by Noguez and Cole, was a Goldberg Assembly staffer and one-time would-be successor to her assembly seat. Conrado can now kiss it good bye thanks to Fabian and Antonio, and instead hitch his wagon to wherever Noguez promises to take him. In the case of George Cole, his 2003 contribution to John Noguez yielded even more phenomenally astronomical returns on Cole's investment. On August 2, 2004, WatchourCity.com reported that "The combined contributions by Fiesta Taxi and Oldtimers Foundation to the campaigns of Gomez, Hernandez and Noguez is $3,500. The transportation contract is worth approximately $3.9 Million. Their combined original investment of $3,500 potentially lands them an astronomical 111,428% return on investment." Even Wall Street can’t beat such gains. Noguez and his lackey slate will sure have a fat campaign piggy bank, to spend on lawn signs and slick printed brochures where he will proclaim himself as a politician of Honesty, Integrity and Experience. And everyone will believe that the man will do something for them. Just don't ask the families and the children of Huntington Park what he's done for them. That's why Noguez will easily be reelected in 2007. Quid Pro Quo, anyone? Air with toxic pollution, indeed. |
Quid Pro Quo From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia: Definition: "Quid pro quo (Latin for "something for something", many times understood by English speakers as "what for what" or "tit for tat") is used to mean, in the English speaking world, a favor for a favor (in other linguistic contexts, such as Portuguese and French, it means a misunderstanding, a confusion - to take the this for a that and quid pro quo is quoted as do ut des, Latin for "I give, so that you give"). Quid pro quo is a legal term for the transaction of valued items or favours, in return for giving something of value. For a contract to be binding, it usually must involve consideration, that is, the exchange of something of quantifiable value, however, quid pro quo is widely used in the context of describing political favours, as given in apparent exchange for money. It is also widely known as a legally recognized type of sexual harassment in some countries. "For democratic public officials with special powers of government, favours given in quid pro quo constitute a breach of the public trust and a dishonest circumventing of the democratic process for special interests. In the context of political favors, quid pro quo, being secretive, may find widely varied avenues for how such transactions (believed quid pro quo) might take place. Among these are straight favours for cash transactions, political campaign contributions, third-party campaigns and related assistance, and favours for favours (quite common in government). The last, favours for favours, refers to officials of different capacities, each in league with special interests, similar or otherwise; exchanging favours, based on an estimated equality of their value. "Merriam-Webster, the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (Fourth Edition), and the New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy (Third Edition) all define the Latin expression "quid pro quo" to mean "something for something." Its definition is cited as an equal exchange or substitution of goods or services. "This phrase was used famously by Hannibal Lecter (Anthony Hopkins) in the popular 1991 movie, The Silence of the Lambs. It was also used in Austin Powers in Goldmember by Dr. Evil (Mike Myers), in a parody reference to Lambs, to which Austin Powers (also Mike Myers) responded, "Yes. Squid pro row." |